Suing Dog is NOT the Answer....

Drumbeat to my girl, AJ of Over Analyze It for posting the latest goings on with The Chapman vs. Tucker/Monique (nicca gf).

After reading this article in the National Enquirer, it confirmed what I already knew. Bigmama Beth co-signed that racist crap...and well Lyssa-even the "Britney Spears extensions kit" didn't help the poor child too much. Lyssa on the left For job security purposes if she (and her other siblings) wants to keep working with daddy, she (they) better subscribe to daddy's theology otherwise, to the unemployment line they go.
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything....esp daddy's crap.

***Moving on...this blog is primarily about the girlfriend of Dog's son Tucker. Her name is Monique. Monique was the one Dog was referencing to in the infamously recorded phone call. It turns out now that she's decided to sue Doug Chapman. *sigh* Ok. Monique, let me ask you this: If Dog wasn't "The Dog" would you even THINK of suing him, or would you simply say,"you know what? He's a loser and I don't need him or his twisted dysfunctional family in my life??

Yep...he disrespected you. Yep you were embarrassed, yep everyone is aware of you now. So what. What do you hope to achieve by suing him? I know you didn't ask but i'm giving it anyway...suing Dog is spiteful. He's making such a fool out of himself trying to prove he'snot racist that it's comical. Bigmama Beth needs to make rounds with him...but anyway. Suing him isn't going to change anything...except maybe add the word "opportunist" to the "N-word" to describe you.

It's not worth it. Dog isn't worth it, Bigmama Beth isn't worth it...I pray that God heals your heart and you can come to forgive them, but they're not worth it. Forgive and move on. It's easier said than done, but it can be done.

Excuse me, but wasn't this country founded on the Word of God?!

YOU CAN'T DO THAT IN HERE: Court employees sue court for religious discrimination.
(October 5, 2007) (source: eurweb.com)

Advocates for Faith and Freedom filed a lawsuit with the Federal District Court in San Diego on behalf of several employees whose constitutional right of equal access was denied by the Superior Court of San Diego when they were forced to stop using a weekly meeting place for their lunchtime Bible study.

In April 2006, Mindy Barlow and Dalia R. Smith, court employees for the Superior Court, were told that their Bible study group could not meet in an empty jury room or courtroom during the lunch hour, even though other groups are allowed to use the court's facilities.
The Bible study group had been meeting since 2000 when the court initially gave them permission. Six years later, they were suddenly and arbitrarily denied use, forcing them to seek further approval.

Meanwhile, the court instituted a policy requiring all individuals, groups, or organizations seeking to use court facilities to submit an application. When the Bible study participants submitted their application, the courts denied their request, stating that approval of the Bible study would violate the separation of church and state.

"The constitutional rights of these court employees cannot be ignored simply because they work for the state," said Advocates' Legal Counsel, Jennifer Monk. "This Bible study should be given access to court facilities in the same manner as other groups, regardless of the -fact that they meet to study the Bible."

By rejecting the court employees' right to hold a Bible study, the San Diego Superior Court has directly violated the group members' First Amendment rights of free speech and free exercise of religion. The lawsuit accordingly asks the Federal District Court to declare the policy implemented by the courts unconstitutional and, in doing so, to allow the Bible study to resume meeting in court facilities.

Robert Tyler, General Counsel for Advocates for Faith and Freedom commented: "It is not too surprising when government agencies misapply applicable constitutional principles, but this is the Superior Court of California - they should know better."
Advocates' co-counsel on the case is the American Center for Law and Justice, a constitutional legal organization based in Virginia Beach, VA..

Advocates for Faith and Freedom is a national nonprofit legal organization whose aim is to protect religious liberty in the courts. For more information, visit http://www.faith-freedom.com/.
*****************

You better recognize, it'll only be a matter of time before it comes to your workplace!

Jesus take the wheel!!